HARRIS v. PAGE
This text of HARRIS v. PAGE (HARRIS v. PAGE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KAHYAN HARRIS, JR., : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-CV-4372 : LEBRON, : Defendant. :
ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Correctional Officer Lebron’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16), and Plaintiff Kahyan Harris, Jr.’s failure to comply with the Court’s Orders to file a Response thereto (ECF Nos. 17, 20), and to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (ECF No. 23), it is ORDERED that: 1. All remaining claims against Defendant Lebron are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE due to Harris’s failure to prosecute this case, for the reasons stated in the Court’s accompanying Memorandum applying the factors announced in Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984). 2. Defendant Lebron’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
HARRIS v. PAGE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-page-paed-2024.