Harris v. Pacific Intermountain Express
This text of 197 N.W.2d 661 (Harris v. Pacific Intermountain Express) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Certiorari to review a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding employee compensation on the basis of total and permanent disability. Relators challenge the finding of permanent disability and further allege that the Workmen’s Compensation Commission failed to fulfill its function when it refused to retry the case on appeal. We affirm.
No purpose would be served in restating the facts involved. It is sufficient that upon a careful review of the proceedings herein it is the opinion of this court that the finding of permanent disability of the employee is supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted.
As to the other issue raised by relators, we have disposed of this in the case of Holland v. Independent School Dist. No. 332, 274 Minn. 380, 385, 144 N. W. 2d 49, 52 (1966), where we said:
“* * * Under § 176.421, subd. 6(2), the commission, on appeal from a decision of a referee, may hear other evidence. There is nothing in the statute that makes it mandatory for the commission to hear additional testimony, but instead it is vested with discretion in that regard.” [482]*482Respondent is allowed $400 in attorney’s fees.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 N.W.2d 661, 293 Minn. 481, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-pacific-intermountain-express-minn-1972.