Harris v. Pacific
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-60738 Summary Calendar
JIMMY HARRIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JEANENNE PACIFIC; GRAY BURDICK; ANTHONY J. BUCKLEY; THOMAS GENE CLARK; DAVID RATCLIFF; BILLY JOE LANDRUM,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (2:95-CV-186-PS)
May 21, 1996
Before JOHNSON, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
Jimmy Harris (“Harris”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Harris contends that he was illegally sentenced to life in
prison as a result of the defendants’ conspiracy and that the defendants’ actions violated his rights
under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments. Having reviewed the record and Harris’s
brief, we find no error in the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action on frivolity grounds.
AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. Pacific (Harris v. Pacific) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.