Harris v. Norton
7 Wend. 534
This text of 7 Wend. 534 (Harris v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harris v. Norton, 7 Wend. 534 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).
Opinion
By the Court,
The two referees, the third not attending, had no authority to adjourn the hearing. Referees have no power to act unless all attend. The concurrence of two, had the third been present, would have been enough, but only two attending, they could not do any act affecting the rights of the parties. The report must be set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wood v. Helme
14 R.I. 325 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1884)
Jackson v. Ives
22 Wend. 637 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 Wend. 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-norton-nysupct-1832.