Harris v. Norton

7 Wend. 534
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 7, 1832·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson J.

The two referees, the third not attending, had no authority to adjourn the hearing. Referees have no power to act unless all attend. The concurrence of two, had the third been present, would have been enough, but only two attending, they could not do any act affecting the rights of the parties. The report must be set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Norton, 7 Wend. 534 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).

7 Wend. 534 (Harris v. Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. Helme
14 R.I. 325 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1884)
Jackson v. Ives
22 Wend. 637 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)