Harris v. Norman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harris v. Norman

413 S.W.3d 664, 2013 WL 5740093, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1253

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 2013·No. No. WD 76134·Published

Opinion

[665] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Harris appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition for declaratory judgment, which claimed that the Board of Probation and Parole had incorrectly calculated the mandatory minimum prison term he would have to serve before being eligible for parole. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[665] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Harris appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition for declaratory judgment, which claimed that the Board of Probation and Parole had incorrectly calculated the mandatory minimum prison term he would have to serve before being eligible for parole. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Harris v. Norman, 413 S.W.3d 664, 2013 WL 5740093, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1253 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

413 S.W.3d 664 (Harris v. Norman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.