Harris v. New York Athletic Club
This text of 153 Misc. 840 (Harris v. New York Athletic Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Section 1078 of the Civil Practice Act does not prohibit the plaintiff from pursuing her cause of action on a coupon attached to a bond securing a second mortgage while the action is pending to foreclose a first mortgage. (See Reichert v. Stilwell, 172 N. Y. 83.) It was, therefore, error to deny summary judgment.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 Misc. 840, 276 N.Y.S. 211, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-new-york-athletic-club-nyappterm-1934.