Harris v. New York Athletic Club

153 Misc. 840, 276 N.Y.S. 211, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2014
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 6, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 153 Misc. 840 (Harris v. New York Athletic Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. New York Athletic Club, 153 Misc. 840, 276 N.Y.S. 211, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2014 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Section 1078 of the Civil Practice Act does not prohibit the plaintiff from pursuing her cause of action on a coupon attached to a bond securing a second mortgage while the action is pending to foreclose a first mortgage. (See Reichert v. Stilwell, 172 N. Y. 83.) It was, therefore, error to deny summary judgment.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.

All concur; present, Lydon, Hammer and Shientag, JJ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reichert v. . Stilwell
64 N.E. 790 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 Misc. 840, 276 N.Y.S. 211, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-new-york-athletic-club-nyappterm-1934.