Harris v. Navarro

600 So. 2d 1147, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5091, 1992 WL 98817
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 1992·No. No. 90-2447·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Viewed in the required light most favorable to appellees as the jury verdict winners, the record demonstrates as a matter of law that there was no justification for Officer Hoffman’s intentional shooting of the decedent. Sections 776.012, 776.05, 933.15, Fla.Stat. (1985). See also Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1, 105 S.Ct. 1694, 85 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). Accordingly, the judgment below is reversed and the cause remanded for entry of judgment on liability for the plaintiffs and a new trial on damages.

DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R„ Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Navarro, 600 So. 2d 1147, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5091, 1992 WL 98817 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

600 So. 2d 1147 (Harris v. Navarro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

US Fire Ins. v. Morrison Assur.
600 So. 2d 1147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)