Harris v. Mosteller

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harris v. Mosteller

253 So. 2d 275

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 1971

DocketNo. 71-38

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 253 So. 2d 275 (Harris v. Mosteller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Mosteller, 253 So. 2d 275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PIERCE, Chief Judge.

Appellants, Robin Harris and James E. Harris, Plaintiffs in the Court below, appeal an order granting a motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Lewis Albert Fritter, one of the defendants below, in a law action.

The question as to whether the order is an appealable final order or whether it is an interlocutory order from which an interlocutory appeal would lie has not been raised by appellees, but this Court must raise it sua sponte, Chastain v. Embry, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 33; Bailey v. Allstate Insurance Company, Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 761.

The order under review is obviously not a final order or judgment, Chastain, supra; Bailey, supra. Neither is it an order “granting partial summary judgment on liability,” from which an interlocutory appeal would lie under FAR 4.2, 32 F.S.A. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PIERCE, Chief Judge.

Appellants, Robin Harris and James E. Harris, Plaintiffs in the Court below, appeal an order granting a motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Lewis Albert Fritter, one of the defendants below, in a law action.

The question as to whether the order is an appealable final order or whether it is an interlocutory order from which an interlocutory appeal would lie has not been raised by appellees, but this Court must raise it sua sponte, Chastain v. Embry, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 33; Bailey v. Allstate Insurance Company, Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 761.

The order under review is obviously not a final order or judgment, Chastain, supra; Bailey, supra. Neither is it an order “granting partial summary judgment on liability,” from which an interlocutory appeal would lie under FAR 4.2, 32 F.S.A. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 So. 2d 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-mosteller-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack