Harris v. Mosolevsky

123 N.Y.S. 56

This text of 123 N.Y.S. 56 (Harris v. Mosolevsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Mosolevsky, 123 N.Y.S. 56 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

Judgment by default has been entered against the defendant, although at the time the case was called for trial the undisputed proof showed that the defendant’s counsel was actually engaged in a. court of record. It is suggested by the respondent that the court investigated the claim of the defendant’s counsel that he was actually engaged in a court of record and found that it was not true. We have no means of knowing what investigations the court below made, and must render judgment upon the record which is before us.

The order is reversed, and the judgment is vacated, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 N.Y.S. 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-mosolevsky-nyappterm-1910.