Harris v. Morrison
49 A.D.3d 276, 851 N.Y.2d 871
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 2008
StatusPublished
This text of 49 A.D.3d 276 (Harris v. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harris v. Morrison, 49 A.D.3d 276, 851 N.Y.2d 871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
Opinion
Plaintiff showed “sufficient cause . . . why the complaint should not be dismissed” (CPLR 3215 [c]). Acceptance of the excuse offered for the relatively short delay was, under the circumstances, a proper exercise of judicial discretion (see Pappoe v Custodio, 156 AD2d 211 [1989]). Concur-Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pappoe v. Custodio
156 A.D.2d 211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 276, 851 N.Y.2d 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-morrison-nyappdiv-2008.