Harris v. Migliore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harris v. Migliore

789 So. 2d 477, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9151, 2001 WL 747316

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 5, 2001

DocketNo. 4D00-3309

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 789 So. 2d 477 (Harris v. Migliore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Migliore, 789 So. 2d 477, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9151, 2001 WL 747316 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The mother complains that, in denying her petition for modification to permit her to relocate with the parties’ children and new husband, the trial court refused to consider the increased salary and benefits her new husband would gain by relocating. To the contrary, the trial court considered all of the evidence, and in a very thoughtful opinion explained exactly why it found that the move was not in the children’s best interests. The trial court concluded that the benefits of the move to the mother and her new husband did not outweigh the detriment to the father/child relationship. See Flint v. Fortson, 744 So.2d 1217, 1218-19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

[478]*478We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

POLEN, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The mother complains that, in denying her petition for modification to permit her to relocate with the parties’ children and new husband, the trial court refused to consider the increased salary and benefits her new husband would gain by relocating. To the contrary, the trial court considered all of the evidence, and in a very thoughtful opinion explained exactly why it found that the move was not in the children’s best interests. The trial court concluded that the benefits of the move to the mother and her new husband did not outweigh the detriment to the father/child relationship. See Flint v. Fortson, 744 So.2d 1217, 1218-19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

[478]*478We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

POLEN, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

789 So. 2d 477, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9151, 2001 WL 747316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-migliore-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack