Harris v. Messitte

637 F. App'x 107
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 8, 2016·No. Nos. 15-2011, 15-2012·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Everrett Harris appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for relief to reopen closed civil cases. Based on our review of the record in these cases and Harris’ informal briefs on appeal, we conclude that these appeals are frivolous. [108] See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Messitte, 637 F. App'x 107 (4th Cir. 2016).

637 F. App'x 107 (Harris v. Messitte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)