Harris v. Messitte

637 F. App'x 107
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 8, 2016
DocketNos. 15-2011, 15-2012
StatusPublished

This text of 637 F. App'x 107 (Harris v. Messitte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Messitte, 637 F. App'x 107 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Everrett Harris appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for relief to reopen closed civil cases. Based on our review of the record in these cases and Harris’ informal briefs on appeal, we conclude that these appeals are frivolous. [108]*108See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
637 F. App'x 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-messitte-ca4-2016.