Harris v. Messitte
This text of 518 F. App'x 241 (Harris v. Messitte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[242]*242Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Michael Everrett Harris appeals the district court’s order consolidating his civil complaints against the United States Attorney General and two federal judicial officers and dismissing those complaints as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Harris’ requests for counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Niemeyer, Case No. 8:12-cv-03807-RWT (D.Md. Jan. 10, 2013); Harris v. Messitte, Case No. 8:12-cv-03809-RWT (D.Md. Jan. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid. the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
518 F. App'x 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-messitte-ca4-2013.