Harris v. Meditran Inc./Smoke Shack

600 F. App'x 125
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 21, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1095
StatusPublished

This text of 600 F. App'x 125 (Harris v. Meditran Inc./Smoke Shack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Meditran Inc./Smoke Shack, 600 F. App'x 125 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Cedric Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Harris’ informal brief does not present argument explaining how the district court erred in its disposition, Harris has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
600 F. App'x 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-meditran-incsmoke-shack-ca4-2015.