Harris v. McNinch

44 S.C.L. 35
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 15, 1856
StatusPublished

This text of 44 S.C.L. 35 (Harris v. McNinch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. McNinch, 44 S.C.L. 35 (S.C. Ct. App. 1856).

Opinion

Pee CuriAM.

In this case we concur in the ruling of the Judge below, and find nothing in the verdict of the jury which appears to us to be erroneous.

The motion is dismissed.

O’Neall, Wardlaw, Withers, Whitner, Glover, and MuNRO, JJ., concurring.

Motion dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 S.C.L. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-mcninch-scctapp-1856.