Harris v. Markin

256 A.D. 907, 10 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5354

This text of 256 A.D. 907 (Harris v. Markin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Markin, 256 A.D. 907, 10 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Plaintiff’s cause of action for breach of warranty accrued when the authority of the defendant [908]*908was repudiated and not when the repudiation was discovered by plaintiff. (See Moore v. Maddock, 251 N. Y. 420.) There is sufficient dispute in the record as to when repudiation occurred to warrant a trial of that issue. Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service of a copy of the order with notice of entry thereof, upon payment of said costs. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Maddock
167 N.E. 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D. 907, 10 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-markin-nyappdiv-1939.