Harris v. Logue
This text of 554 S.W.2d 168 (Harris v. Logue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joseph M. Logue et al. obtained a judgment setting aside a prior default judgment rendered in a class action suit brought to remove restrictions on two lots owned by Richard A. Harris and wife. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed on two grounds: because the prior judgment was void and because the elements of a bill of review were proved. 544 S.W.2d 932. We agree that the judgment was correct because of the second ground. We disagree with and disapprove of the writing of the Court of Civil Appeals saying that the prior judgment was void “for want of due process or jurisdiction over necessary parties” and that Logue et al. were entitled to have it set aside without showing their meritorious defense. This writing is contrary to opinions of this Court, including Deen v. Kirk, 508 S.W.2d 70 (Tex.1974) and McEwen v. Harrison, 162 [169]*169Tex. 125, 345 S.W.2d 706 (1961). The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
554 S.W.2d 168, 20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 408, 1977 Tex. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-logue-tex-1977.