Harris v. Lewis State Bank

451 So. 2d 924, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13326
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 1, 1984·No. No. AW-462·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari is denied. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted in part. The lower court’s order of December 12, 1983 denying petitioner’s motion for leave to amend is quashed insofar as it denies leave to add counts stating causes of action in negligence and fraud and deceit. With regard to that portion of the motion seeking to re-state a cause of action in malicious prosecution, the petition is denied and the order affirmed. The cause is remanded for entry of an order granting the motion for leave to amend the complaint in a manner consistent with this order.1

ERVIN, C.J., and MILLS and WENT-WORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Lewis State Bank, 451 So. 2d 924, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13326 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

451 So. 2d 924 (Harris v. Lewis State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Boone
519 So. 2d 1065 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Harris v. Lewis State Bank
482 So. 2d 1378 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)