Harris v. Knickerbacker

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Harris v. Knickerbacker

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 73

CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

DecidedJuly 1, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 73 (Harris v. Knickerbacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Knickerbacker, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 73 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court of Errors reversed the decision, holding that the answer sufficiently denied the agreement as to interest, and that the evidence of the one witness was not sufficient to destroy the effect of the denial in the answer.

But leave was given the complainant to amend his bill so as to make it conform to the terms of the contract, as admitted by the answer of the defendant; upon such terms as to costs in the court below, as the Chancellor should direct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court of Errors reversed the decision, holding that the answer sufficiently denied the agreement as to interest, and that the evidence of the one witness was not sufficient to destroy the effect of the denial in the answer.

But leave was given the complainant to amend his bill so as to make it conform to the terms of the contract, as admitted by the answer of the defendant; upon such terms as to costs in the court below, as the Chancellor should direct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-knickerbacker-nycterr-1799.