Harris v. Kijakazi

E.D. North Carolina

Harris v. Kijakazi

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 7, 2023

Docket5:22-cv-00236

StatusUnknown

This text of Harris v. Kijakazi (Harris v. Kijakazi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Kijakazi, (E.D.N.C. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION JUANITA HARRIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) ) NO. 5:22-CV-00236-KS KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social ) Security, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and upon consideration of Defendant’s unopposed request to remand this cause for further administrative action, the Court hereby reverses Defendant’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to Defendant for further administrative action. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). SO ORDERED this _7th _ day of February , 2023.

DireteliZ Ll Arnick Hon. Kim¥erly A. Swank United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION JUANITA HARRIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) ) NO. 5:22-CV-00236-KS KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social ) Security, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and upon consideration of Defendant’s unopposed request to remand this cause for further administrative action, the Court hereby reverses Defendant’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to Defendant for further administrative action. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). SO ORDERED this _7th _ day of February , 2023.

DireteliZ Ll Arnick Hon. Kim¥erly A. Swank United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Harris v. Kijakazi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-kijakazi-nced-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack