Harris v. Jones

79 S.E. 841, 140 Ga. 768, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 252
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 15, 1913·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

1. An agreement between a creditor, his debtor, and a third person, whereby such third person, in consideration of the creditor’s releasing the debtor, agrees to pay the amount of the debt to the creditor, and as part of the agreement the creditor releases his debtor and agrees that such third person shall be substituted for the debtor, is not within the statute' of frauds; the debt is extinguished as to the debtor, and the third person becomes, by substitution, the debtor in his place. Palmetto Manufacturing Co. v. Parker, 123 Ga. 798 (51 S. E. 714).

2. The charges complained of were in substantial accord with the foregoing principle, and the verdict was supported by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concu/r.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Jones, 79 S.E. 841, 140 Ga. 768, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 252 (Ga. 1913).

79 S.E. 841 (Harris v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Klag v. Home Insurance Co.
158 S.E.2d 444 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Fuller v. Holsomback
156 S.E. 460 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Brooks v. Key & Townsend
129 S.E. 913 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Holt v. Empire Tire & Rubber Co.
127 S.E. 803 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Jones v. White
91 S.E. 793 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Hicks v. Walker
87 S.E. 152 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)