Harris v. Howe

27 N.E. 561, 129 Ind. 72, 1891 Ind. LEXIS 20
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 16, 1891
DocketNo. 14,505
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 27 N.E. 561 (Harris v. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Howe, 27 N.E. 561, 129 Ind. 72, 1891 Ind. LEXIS 20 (Ind. 1891).

Opinion

Miller, J. —

This was a proceeding supplementary to execution, instituted under section 819, R. S. 1881, in aid of the collection of a judgment.

We are of the opinion that the cause is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Appellate Court. The action is “ for the recovery of money only,” and the amount in controversy is less than one thousand dollars. We do not think that the fact that it may be necessary for the court to pass upon the validity of a transfer of property, where it incidentally arises, is sufficient to deprive the Appellate Court of jurisdiction. Baker v. Groves, 126 Ind. 593; Parker v. Indianapolis Nat’l Bank, 126 Ind. 595.

The clerk of this court is, therefore, directed to transfer this cause to the Appellate Court for final determination.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pisarski v. Glowiszyn
41 N.E.2d 358 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1942)
Curless v. Watson
102 N.E. 497 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1913)
Ex parte Kiley
34 N.E. 989 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)
Huber v. Beck
32 N.E. 1025 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)
Branson v. Studabaker
33 N.E. 98 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 N.E. 561, 129 Ind. 72, 1891 Ind. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-howe-ind-1891.