Harris v. Hawkins

Fourth Circuit

Harris v. Hawkins

164 F. App'x 440

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 8, 2006·No. No. 05-7698·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Barry L. Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hams v. Hawkins, No. CA-05-567-2-RGD (E.D.Va. Oct. 11, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Barry L. Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hams v. Hawkins, No. CA-05-567-2-RGD (E.D.Va. Oct. 11, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Harris v. Hawkins, 164 F. App'x 440 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

164 F. App'x 440 (Harris v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related