Harris v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harris v. Harris

253 A.D. 815, 1 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8748

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 10, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 815 (Harris v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Harris, 253 A.D. 815, 1 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover money loaned and salary unpaid under an alleged agreement of employment, plaintiff’s motion for discovery and inspection was granted. On the state of this record the order is too comprehensive. The second ordering paragraph thereof is modified to provide for production and inspection of only the journal, cash book, general ledger, accounts payable book and minute book for the period commencing April 26, 1933, and ending June 12, 1937. The production and inspection will commence at the place and time [816]*816specified in the. order on five days’ notice. As so modified the order of the County Court of Nassau county is affirmed, without costs. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover money loaned and salary unpaid under an alleged agreement of employment, plaintiff’s motion for discovery and inspection was granted. On the state of this record the order is too comprehensive. The second ordering paragraph thereof is modified to provide for production and inspection of only the journal, cash book, general ledger, accounts payable book and minute book for the period commencing April 26, 1933, and ending June 12, 1937. The production and inspection will commence at the place and time [816]*816specified in the. order on five days’ notice. As so modified the order of the County Court of Nassau county is affirmed, without costs. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 815, 1 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-harris-nyappdiv-1938.