Harris v. Harris

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 26, 2018·No. 5D17-792·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

EARLY HARRIS, III,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-792

TANYA MICHELLE HARRIS,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed March 29, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Tonya B. Rainwater, Judge.

Angela Lynn Leiner, of The Law Office of Angela L. Leiner, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

John J. Albert, of Albert & Donnelly, LLC, Melbourne, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Tramble v. Tramble, 193 So. 3d 1105, 1105 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)

(holding that in absence of transcript or statement of evidence, appellate court’s review

is limited to errors appearing on face of final judgment or in pleadings and other matters

in record); Spreng v. Spreng, 162 So. 3d 168, 169 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (holding that

although trial court’s order awarding wife attorney’s fees was deficient in its factual findings, error was not preserved for appeal because husband never filed motion for

rehearing); Hedstrom v. Hedstrom, 123 So. 3d 150, 152 n.4 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)

(reiterating that party cannot complain on appeal about inadequate findings unless

alleged defect was brought to trial court’s attention in motion for rehearing).

SAWAYA, EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Harris, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Harris v. Harris (Harris v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tramble v. Tramble
193 So. 3d 1105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Hedstrom v. Hedstrom
123 So. 3d 150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Spreng v. Spreng
162 So. 3d 168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)