Harris v. Harris

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harris v. Harris

64 So. 3d 1288, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11181, 2011 WL 2753874

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 2011·No. No. 1D11-1446·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that the lower tribunal’s March 15, 2011, Order is not a final order because it fails to resolve the issues of parental time-sharing and parental responsibility. Cf. Ward v. Bragg, 957 So.2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction where order on appeal contemplated additional hearing on visitation). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature. The dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to seek review upon entry of a final order.

BENTON, C.J., CLARK and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that the lower tribunal’s March 15, 2011, Order is not a final order because it fails to resolve the issues of parental time-sharing and parental responsibility. Cf. Ward v. Bragg, 957 So.2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction where order on appeal contemplated additional hearing on visitation). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature. The dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to seek review upon entry of a final order.

BENTON, C.J., CLARK and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Harris v. Harris, 64 So. 3d 1288, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11181, 2011 WL 2753874 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

64 So. 3d 1288 (Harris v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related