Harris v. Harris

718 So. 2d 891, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11546, 1998 WL 601334
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 760 So. 2d 152
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 1998·No. No. 98-1236·Published

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

In this case the former wife appeals an emergency order transferring primary residential responsibility for her minor son to her former husband. The order was entered without notice and apparently was based on an oral report presented to the trial court by a guardian ad litem in the case, which report was based on a psychological evaluation of the child. We have no record of the proceedings before the trial court.

We are perplexed by the filing of the instant appeal wherein we have no basis to approve or to disapprove the action of the trial court. Indeed, the appellant has vehemently moved to strike the psychological report relied upon by the guardian ad litem, and any reference thereto, from consideration by this court — leaving us with only the representations of the parties in their respective briefs. Why did not counsel for the former wife simply proceed before the trial court to set the disputed emergency order (entered on April 27,1998) for an expeditious evidentiary hearing with notice and a court reporter? That would have provided a proper basis for review by this court.

As it is, we can only note our frustration and affirm the action of the trial court, which arrives here with a presumption of correctness — and with little else.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Harris, 718 So. 2d 891, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11546, 1998 WL 601334 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

718 So. 2d 891 (Harris v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.