Harris v. Grimstead

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Harris v. Grimstead

1925 OK 557, 240 P. 314, 112 Okla. 59, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 535

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 30, 1925

DocketNo 15437

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1925 OK 557 (Harris v. Grimstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Grimstead, 1925 OK 557, 240 P. 314, 112 Okla. 59, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 535 (Okla. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion toy

STEPHENSON, C.

E. E. Grimstead and Eugene F. Scott, a partnership, engaged in the practice of law, commenced their action against Pat H. Harris, (to recover for legal services rendered for the defendant. The trial of the cause resulted in judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant has appealed the cause to this court and assigns as error that the verdict and judgment are contrary to the law and the evidence.

It would serve no useful purpose to detail the evidence given in the trial of the cause by the respective parties. It is sufficient to say that there is ample competent evidence 'to support the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiffs. Young v. Eaton, 82 Okla. 106, 198 Pac. 857.

It is recommended that the judgment, be affirmed.

By ithe Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI