Harris v. Gladstone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harris v. Gladstone

271 A.D.2d 849

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 849 (Harris v. Gladstone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Gladstone, 271 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from three judgments entered in favor of the plaintiffs-respondents after a trial by jury in the Supreme Court, Chenango County. The actions arose out of a collision between the automobiles which happened on December 24, 1945, on a State highway between the hamlet of Coventry and the village of Bainbridge, Chenango County. The evidence presented a typical question of fact for a jury as to negligence. Bach driver, and their witnesses, asserted that he was on his own side of the road when the accident happened, and in all the testimony we do not find that the verdicts were against the weight of evidence, and neither do we find them excessive. Judgments affirmed, with costs. Heffernan, Foster and Lawrence, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Brewster, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from three judgments entered in favor of the plaintiffs-respondents after a trial by jury in the Supreme Court, Chenango County. The actions arose out of a collision between the automobiles which happened on December 24, 1945, on a State highway between the hamlet of Coventry and the village of Bainbridge, Chenango County. The evidence presented a typical question of fact for a jury as to negligence. Bach driver, and their witnesses, asserted that he was on his own side of the road when the accident happened, and in all the testimony we do not find that the verdicts were against the weight of evidence, and neither do we find them excessive. Judgments affirmed, with costs. Heffernan, Foster and Lawrence, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Brewster, J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-gladstone-nyappdiv-1946.