Harris v. Gibb

Fourth Circuit

Harris v. Gibb

86 F. App'x 577

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 28, 2004·No. Nos. 03-7371, 03-7372·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Rodney Victor Harris appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Gibb, No. CA-3-546-7 (W.D.Va. Aug. 27, 2003); Harris v. Steele, No. CA-03-550-7 (W.D.Va. Aug. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [578] in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Rodney Victor Harris appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Gibb, No. CA-3-546-7 (W.D.Va. Aug. 27, 2003); Harris v. Steele, No. CA-03-550-7 (W.D.Va. Aug. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [578] in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Harris v. Gibb, 86 F. App'x 577 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

86 F. App'x 577 (Harris v. Gibb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related