Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.
This text of 14 F.3d 601 (Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
14 F.3d 601
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Teresa HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant (91-5301);
Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant (91-5871);
Plaintiff-Appellee (91-5822),
v.
FORKLIFT SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee (91-5301);
Defendant-Cross-Appellee (91-5971);
Defendant-Appellant 91-5822).
Nos. 91-5301, 91-5871 and 91-5822.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 16, 1993.
Before: NELSON, NORRIS and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
On November 9, 1993, the United States Supreme Court reversed this court's judgment in this appeal and remanded the cause for further proceedings. Pursuant to that remand, we in turn remand the cause to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville, for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion, which is attached.
See 114 S.Ct. 367
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 F.3d 601, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-forklift-systems-inc-ca6-1993.