Harris v. Floyd, Mayor

129 S.E. 833, 132 S.C. 487, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 241
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 14, 1925
Docket11839
StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 833 (Harris v. Floyd, Mayor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Floyd, Mayor, 129 S.E. 833, 132 S.C. 487, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 241 (S.C. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner brings this proceeding in the original jurisdiction to enjoin the sale by the city of Spartanburg of $790,000 street improvement bonds, on the ground that the proposed issue, plus outstanding sfreet bonds, will create a bonded debt for street improvements in excess of the constitutional limitation imposed on that city by an amendment ratified March 11, 1923 (33 Stat., 129).

The identical question was decided adversely to petitioner’s contention in Heinitsh v. Floyd, 130 S. C., 434; 126 S. E., 336.

The injunction prayed is therefore refused, and the petition dismissed.

Mr. Chief Justice Gary and Messrs. Justices Watts, Cothran and Marion concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heinitsh v. Floyd, Mayor
126 S.E. 336 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 833, 132 S.C. 487, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-floyd-mayor-sc-1925.