Harris v. Florida Parole Commission
This text of 917 So. 2d 217 (Harris v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Petitioner seeks certiorari review of a final order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. The pertinent facts of this case are substantively identical to those in Merritt v. Crosby, 893 So.2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, we are bound by the holding in Merritt and, as in Merritt, we grant the petition, quash the order denying the petition for a writ of mandamus, and remand to the trial court for expedited proceedings consistent with that decision.
PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED; and REMANDED, with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
917 So. 2d 217, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17934, 2005 WL 3042673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2005.