Harris v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harris v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement

625 So. 2d 1327, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11194, 1993 WL 452263

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 8, 1993

DocketNo. 93-874

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 625 So. 2d 1327 (Harris v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement, 625 So. 2d 1327, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11194, 1993 WL 452263 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Clyde Harris appeals an order of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement which revoked his certification as a correctional officer. Harris contends there was error in the lower tribunal when, in the course of an informal administrative hearing, disputed issues of material fact came to light and where Harris was not granted a formal administrative hearing in accordance with section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes. After the filing of the initial brief, the department moved for a relinquishment of jurisdiction, showing that the parties now agree that appellant is entitled to a formal hearing.

As in Stacey v. Department of Professional Regulation, 547 So.2d 241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), Martin County Liquors v. Department of Business Regulation, 539 So.2d 8 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) and Cole v. Department of Professional Regulation, 502 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), we treat this motion as a confession of error and reverse and remand for further proceedings.

ZEHMER, C.J., and MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Clyde Harris appeals an order of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement which revoked his certification as a correctional officer. Harris contends there was error in the lower tribunal when, in the course of an informal administrative hearing, disputed issues of material fact came to light and where Harris was not granted a formal administrative hearing in accordance with section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes. After the filing of the initial brief, the department moved for a relinquishment of jurisdiction, showing that the parties now agree that appellant is entitled to a formal hearing.

As in Stacey v. Department of Professional Regulation, 547 So.2d 241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), Martin County Liquors v. Department of Business Regulation, 539 So.2d 8 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) and Cole v. Department of Professional Regulation, 502 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), we treat this motion as a confession of error and reverse and remand for further proceedings.

ZEHMER, C.J., and MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

625 So. 2d 1327, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11194, 1993 WL 452263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-florida-department-of-law-enforcement-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack