Harris v. Firth
This text of 11 F. Cas. 625 (Harris v. Firth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
gave the instruction as prayed by Mr. Brent.
And, at the prayer of Mr. Coxe, for the defendant, further instructed them, in effect, that, if Wilkes, being the owner of the petitioner, came to reside here as a sojourner, and while so being a sojourner, brought the petitioner here, and died, and the defendant, since his death, has been prevented by the institution of this suit from carrying the petitioner out of the district, he is not entitled to freedom by reason of his being so brought in.
Verdict for the petitioner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 F. Cas. 625, 4 D.C. 710, 4 Cranch 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-firth-circtddc-1836.