Harris v. Farrar
This text of 1925 OK 689 (Harris v. Farrar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is appealed from the district court of Osage county, and defendant in error moves to dismiss on the ground of duplicity. This appeal embraces three separate and distinct cases, one of which is in no wise related to tile other two. Case No. 7281 is an action brought by Monroe Harris by F. W. Farrar, for an accounting and to cancel an $8,000 mortgage. Fairer ffiecl an answer and cross-petition seeking to foreclose the mortgage. Case No. 7432 is an action brought by F. IV. Farrar v. Monroe Harris to foreclose a mortgage for $10 000. These two cases were consolidated by order of the trial court. Ca~e No. 7433 was an action by Wah-t3-Sah an Incompetent, by F. W. Farrar, Guardian v. Monroe Harris to foreclose a certain mort-ga'4e in the sum of $700. This case has no relation whatever to either of the other two cases, and was not consolidated therewith. A separate judgment was rendered in the case and separate orders made thorein all the way through. All three oi these cases are attempted to be brought into this court on one case-made and one petition in error.
This appeal is c]earfy duplicitous and is dismissed. Harper v. Stumpf, 84 Okla. 187, 203 Pac. 104; Callahan v. Nida, 86 Okla. 279, 207 Pac. 968.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1925 OK 689, 241 P. 1119, 121 Okla. 213, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-farrar-okla-1925.