Harris v. Fahle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harris v. Fahle

119 A.D.2d 630, 500 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55557

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A.D.2d 630 (Harris v. Fahle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Fahle, 119 A.D.2d 630, 500 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55557 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action for injunctive relief, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), dated January 16, 1985, which, upon the plaintiffs’ motion, authorized them or their agents to enter upon the defendants’ premises and remove 16 dogs and lodge them in an animal shelter for 30 days.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting the plaintiffs relief since the determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Health Services of the County of Suffolk ordering the abatement of the public nuisance (see, Fahle v County of Suffolk, 119 AD2d 628) was not completely complied with. The Commissioner and his agents were authorized by statute to enter the defendants’ property and remove the dogs, so as to abate the nuisance caused by these dogs on the property, resulting from, inter alia, the inadequate sanitary facilities for them (Public Health Law § 1305). Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Fiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action for injunctive relief, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), dated January 16, 1985, which, upon the plaintiffs’ motion, authorized them or their agents to enter upon the defendants’ premises and remove 16 dogs and lodge them in an animal shelter for 30 days.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting the plaintiffs relief since the determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Health Services of the County of Suffolk ordering the abatement of the public nuisance (see, Fahle v County of Suffolk, 119 AD2d 628) was not completely complied with. The Commissioner and his agents were authorized by statute to enter the defendants’ property and remove the dogs, so as to abate the nuisance caused by these dogs on the property, resulting from, inter alia, the inadequate sanitary facilities for them (Public Health Law § 1305). Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Fiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 630, 500 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-fahle-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack