Harris v. Exon

Supreme Court of Kansas

Harris v. Exon

176 P.2d 260, 162 Kan. 270, 1947 Kan. LEXIS 300

Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 25, 1947·No. No. 36,566·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Upon the original submission of this appeal, an opinion was prepared and filed in which we affirmed the rulings of the trial court of which the appellant complained. The opinion appears in 161 Kan. 582, 170 P. 2d 827. Appellant’s motion for a rehearing was granted and the appeal has been reargued.

Upon consideration, it appears that no contentions or arguments are now made which did not receive our attention after the original submission and which were not treated in our original opinion. We conclude that we should adhere to that opinion, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON REHEARING

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Upon the original submission of this appeal, an opinion was prepared and filed in which we affirmed the rulings of the trial court of which the appellant complained. The opinion appears in 161 Kan. 582, 170 P. 2d 827. Appellant’s motion for a rehearing was granted and the appeal has been reargued.

Upon consideration, it appears that no contentions or arguments are now made which did not receive our attention after the original submission and which were not treated in our original opinion. We conclude that we should adhere to that opinion, and it is so ordered.

Harris v. Exon, 176 P.2d 260, 162 Kan. 270, 1947 Kan. LEXIS 300 (kan 1947).

Pincite

176 P.2d 260 (Harris v. Exon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related