Harris v. . Elliott

60 N.E. 1119, 167 N.Y. 542, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 1122
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. . Elliott. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 N.Y. 269
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 10, 1901·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with a separate" bill of costs to the defendants appearing by Lord, Day & Lord, and another to the defendants appearing by Wyllys Hodges; no opinion.

Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., O’Bbien, Babtlett, Mabtin, Yann, Landon and Cullen, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. . Elliott, 60 N.E. 1119, 167 N.Y. 542, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 1122 (N.Y. 1901).

60 N.E. 1119 (Harris v. . Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.