Harris v. Duckworth

Mississippi Supreme Court

Harris v. Duckworth

69 So. 219, 109 Miss. 430

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1915·Published

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

No judgment should have been rendered against the county of Covington in the court below, not only because the county had been formally dismissed as a party defendant,- but for the further reason that the evidence disclosed no liability on its part.

The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause dismissed, in so far as it affects the county. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed, and will remain in full force and effect.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

No judgment should have been rendered against the county of Covington in the court below, not only because the county had been formally dismissed as a party defendant,- but for the further reason that the evidence disclosed no liability on its part.

The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause dismissed, in so far as it affects the county. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed, and will remain in full force and effect.

Affirmed.

Harris v. Duckworth, 69 So. 219, 109 Miss. 430 (Mich. 1915).

Pincite

69 So. 219 (Harris v. Duckworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.