Harris v. Dixon
This text of Harris v. Dixon (Harris v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-1331 _____________________________
EUGENE HARRIS,
Petitioner,
v.
RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
May 17, 2024
PER CURIAM.
The Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits.
ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Eugene Harris, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harris v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2024.