Harris v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harris v. Division of Employment Security

444 S.W.3d 530, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 922

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 26, 2014·No. No. ED 100750·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Harris appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission dismissing her application for review as untimely. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with- a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Harris appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission dismissing her application for review as untimely. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with- a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Harris v. Division of Employment Security, 444 S.W.3d 530, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 922 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

444 S.W.3d 530 (Harris v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.