Home/District of Columbia Court of Appeals/Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

648 A.2d 674, 1994 D.C. App. LEXIS 176, 1994 WL 541127
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 D.C. App. LEXIS 179 →
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided September 28, 1994·No. No. 90-AA-657·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of respondent’s petition for rehearing en bane, petitioner’s opposition thereto, the motion of respondent for leave to file reply to opposition to petition, the lodged memorandum, and the petition of intervenor for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that the motion of respondent for leave to file reply to opposition to petition is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged memorandum of respondent. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for rehearing en banc are denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, 648 A.2d 674, 1994 D.C. App. LEXIS 176, 1994 WL 541127 (D.C. 1994).

648 A.2d 674 (Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.