Harris v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harris v. Director of Revenue

921 S.W.2d 140, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 739

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. Director of Revenue. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 470 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 30, 1996·No. No. 68026·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition to review the revocation of his driver’s license for refusal to submit to a chemical test of the alcoholic content of his blood. § 577.041, RSMo 1994. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition to review the revocation of his driver’s license for refusal to submit to a chemical test of the alcoholic content of his blood. § 577.041, RSMo 1994. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Harris v. Director of Revenue, 921 S.W.2d 140, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 739 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

921 S.W.2d 140 (Harris v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.