Harris v. Deitrich
29 Mich. 366, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 97
This text of 29 Mich. 366 (Harris v. Deitrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harris v. Deitrich, 29 Mich. 366, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 97 (Mich. 1874).
Opinion
held, without passing upon the disputed questions of fact, that the taking a pro confesso on the same day the amended bill was filed, adding a new and material averment, without serving new process, was irregular, and that the application to open the decree and for a rehearing should have been granted.
Order reversed, with costs, and cause remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wayne Creamery v. Suyak
158 N.W.2d 825 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1968)
Matek v. Matek
63 N.E.2d 583 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1945)
Perkins v. Perkins
147 N.W. 555 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1914)
Commercial National Bank v. Gaukler
130 N.W. 655 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Albright v. Texas, Santa Fe & Northern Railroad
8 N.M. 422 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1896)
Mickle v. Maxfield
3 N.W. 961 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1879)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 Mich. 366, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-deitrich-mich-1874.