Harris v. Deeb

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harris v. Deeb

605 So. 2d 1325, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10692, 1992 WL 282087

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 14, 1992·No. No. 92-00108·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An ex-husband appeals from an order granting the ex-wife’s motion for modification of child support. We affirm in all respects except the following as to which the ex-wife has substantially agreed.

First, the child support for the oldest child should terminate when that child at[1326]*1326tains the age of 18. Second, the ex-husband should not be required to provide life insurance to secure his obligation for support of a child who dies, marries, becomes emancipated, or reaches majority and is not thereafter entitled to support.

Remanded for correction of the Order Granting Supplemental Complaint for Modification, as amended by Order on Rehearing.

LEHAN, C.J., and RYDER and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

An ex-husband appeals from an order granting the ex-wife’s motion for modification of child support. We affirm in all respects except the following as to which the ex-wife has substantially agreed.

First, the child support for the oldest child should terminate when that child at[1326]*1326tains the age of 18. Second, the ex-husband should not be required to provide life insurance to secure his obligation for support of a child who dies, marries, becomes emancipated, or reaches majority and is not thereafter entitled to support.

Remanded for correction of the Order Granting Supplemental Complaint for Modification, as amended by Order on Rehearing.

LEHAN, C.J., and RYDER and HALL, JJ., concur.

Harris v. Deeb, 605 So. 2d 1325, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10692, 1992 WL 282087 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

605 So. 2d 1325 (Harris v. Deeb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related