Harris v. Deeb

605 So. 2d 1325, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10692, 1992 WL 282087
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 14, 1992
DocketNo. 92-00108
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 605 So. 2d 1325 (Harris v. Deeb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Deeb, 605 So. 2d 1325, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10692, 1992 WL 282087 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An ex-husband appeals from an order granting the ex-wife’s motion for modification of child support. We affirm in all respects except the following as to which the ex-wife has substantially agreed.

First, the child support for the oldest child should terminate when that child at[1326]*1326tains the age of 18. Second, the ex-husband should not be required to provide life insurance to secure his obligation for support of a child who dies, marries, becomes emancipated, or reaches majority and is not thereafter entitled to support.

Remanded for correction of the Order Granting Supplemental Complaint for Modification, as amended by Order on Rehearing.

LEHAN, C.J., and RYDER and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arthur v. Arthur
691 So. 2d 997 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1997)
Jerry L. Arthur v. Peggy O. Arthur
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1993

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
605 So. 2d 1325, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10692, 1992 WL 282087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-deeb-fladistctapp-1992.