Harris v. Connolly

Fourth Circuit

Harris v. Connolly

667 F. App'x 408

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2016·No. No. 16-6405·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Charles Harris appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Connolly, No. 5:14-cv-00128-FDW, 2016 WL 676468 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Charles Harris appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Connolly, No. 5:14-cv-00128-FDW, 2016 WL 676468 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Harris v. Connolly, 667 F. App'x 408 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 408 (Harris v. Connolly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related