Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided April 3, 2020·No. 3:17-cv-00317·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO CHERYL HARRIS, ) ) CASE NO. 3:17CV0317 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVINGTON ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER This cause coming before the Court on the joint motion of the parties, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #18) is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney fees in the amount of $4,600.00 and costs in the amount of $0.00, for a total of $4,600.00; 2. Counsel for the parties shall verify whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the United States subject to offset, consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff; and 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: April 3, 2020 s/Sharon L. Ovington _ Sharon L. Ovington United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Ohio 2020).

Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security (Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)