Harris v. Commercial Finance Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Harris v. Commercial Finance Co.

87 S.E. 690, 17 Ga. App. 453, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 677

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 10, 1916

Docket6390

StatusPublished

This text of 87 S.E. 690 (Harris v. Commercial Finance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Commercial Finance Co., 87 S.E. 690, 17 Ga. App. 453, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 677 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

The suit was upon a promissory note, and the defendant filed a plea of non est factum. The evidence, as disclosed by the record, fails to show that the plaintiff successfully carried the burden, which was put upon him when this plea was filed, and the court (sitting without the intervention of a jury) therefore-erred in finding for the plaintiff, and in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Complaint; from city court of Thomasville — Judge W. H. Hammond. February 8, 1915.

Louis S. Moore, O. E. Hay, for plaintiff in error. J. E. Graigmiles, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, J.

The suit was upon a promissory note, and the defendant filed a plea of non est factum. The evidence, as disclosed by the record, fails to show that the plaintiff successfully carried the burden, which was put upon him when this plea was filed, and the court (sitting without the intervention of a jury) therefore-erred in finding for the plaintiff, and in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Complaint; from city court of Thomasville — Judge W. H. Hammond. February 8, 1915.

Louis S. Moore, O. E. Hay, for plaintiff in error. J. E. Graigmiles, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 S.E. 690, 17 Ga. App. 453, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-commercial-finance-co-gactapp-1916.