Harris v. Clark

Fourth Circuit

Harris v. Clark

89 F. App'x 432

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 17, 2004·No. No. 03-2334·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Victor Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Clark, No. CA-03-624-7 (WD.Va. filed Sept. 22, 2003; entered Sept. 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Victor Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Clark, No. CA-03-624-7 (WD.Va. filed Sept. 22, 2003; entered Sept. 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Harris v. Clark, 89 F. App'x 432 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

89 F. App'x 432 (Harris v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related